Planning construction involves sequencing activities in
space and time, like the procurement of materials, labor and other concerns.
This was typically represented by bar charts, and the BIM handbook claims that such
a method is “unable to show how or why certain activities were linked in a
given sequence; nor could they calculate the longest (critical) path to
complete a project.”
Today, we now use software such as Microsoft Project,
Primavera or P3 to create comprehensive schedules (or gantt charts) which
display the steps of procurement and construction, linking every task and
sorting by the most critical. A specialization program, such as Vico Control, is
better suited to building construction by enabling schedulers to do
location-based scheduling and allow multiple teams to do repetitive work in
multiple locations. Even so, only a person with sufficient familiarity with the
project and with scheduling can properly evaluate a gantt chart and determine
if it is a feasible schedule.
The article points to a current dilemma in which the methods
we use today still do not properly capture the spatial components of building
construction. It seeks to solve the shortcomings of the modern way of planning
project by suggesting two solutions. The first is 4D CAD, a 3D CAD software
which incorporates a construction schedule and shows the day to day process of
construction in a 3D model. Faults in the design and the scheduling can be observed
in space and time, which helps designers and contractors identify the issues
and allow them to devise solutions. The second approach is to combine analysis
tools, BIM components, and construction method information to optimize activity
sequencing. This conglomerate, as the handbook explains, incorporates spatial,
resource utilization, and productivity information.
Of the two options described in the handbook, 4D simulations
seem like the most sensible. The potential for collaboration and communication
between owner, designer and contractors using 4D CAD is high. Contractors can
review projects to determine the feasibility and can make accurate schedules
based on the design. If a community or public project uses 4D CAD, the layman
will be able to understand the project may impact his day to day life. Site
logistics would benefit from the use of 4D CAD since they would be able to plan
laydown areas, access points and location of large equipment. Last but not
least, the 4D tool can compare different schedules and can easily determine if
a project is early, on track, or behind schedule.
Reference
Chuck Eastman, Paul Teicholz, Rafael Sacks, Kathleen Liston;
“Bim Hanbook, a Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers,
Designers, Engineers, and Contractors” Second Edition, Chapter 5; Second
Edition 2011
Carvalho, your post is very detailed in discuss the 4D CAD. I clear see the advantage that 4D method can bring to us mostly making sure the project is on the track. By the way, I like the picture you pick to display the 4D software.
ReplyDeleteIan,
ReplyDeleteI'm curious if any type of special training will be needed for this type of software. 2-D and 3-D CAD are pretty substantial programs and take many years to master. If this software is going to be used by contractors, would they have to hire experts to perform these tasks? Or is the approach to this software relatively simple?