The subject of concern for this
week’s blog is in regard to the BIM handbook.
This handbook is a great introduction to what BIM modeling is, what it does,
and the major uses of BIM. For my group,
Chapter 2 is the main focus for this post.
The chapter first begins
discussing, briefly, the history of BIM modeling. This was quite interesting to read because it
gave a foundation of how BIM started out and how it became the powerhouse
program that it is today. The most
interesting part about its history was the fact that two different modeling techniques
were actually competing with each other for several years before finally
joining forces. Boundary representation approach
(b-rep) defined shapes as “closed, oriented set of bounded surface” while the
other approach, constructive sold geometry (CSG), did not bound the shapes, but
instead had the shapes correspond to algorithms and values that could be used
to calculate different features of the shape, such as points, radius, or
diameters. You wouldn’t be able to tell,
using modern programs, that these two were separate entities until finally coming
together in current modeling software. CSG
is great for real time editing, and B-rep is good for measuring and gathering
information regarding the model.
The next
section discussed how different types of software can only account for certain
types of predefined objects that are used in the design process for the
construction of a project. Two tables
are given, 2-1 and 2-2, which give the built in families and predefined objects
for a range of programs. These two
tables illustrate an important fact: each program has its own niche that it
fills. Although all of them are used in
design, each one has its own strengths that it brings to the table. For example, Bentley Mechanical and
Electrical has objects for the HVAC systems in a building, while Tekla has more
objects that relate to the structural aspects of a building. Additionally, each of these programs has complementary
programs where data can be transferred easily.
When it comes to parametric design, the user can pick their poison and
decide what would be the best program for design.
One last
topic that this chapter covered was how parametric design is useful in making
edits much more easily in the program.
For example, if one part of a wall needed to be changed, that change can
be made so that the walls and shapes around it updated accordingly. This in turn can allow the properties and
attributes to update so that all relevant information can be automatically
changed so that no time is wasted manually changing these values. This is huge step from CAD programs where these
pieces of information did not have the luxury of this.
After
reading this chapter, I did learn a little more about BIM modeling. I never really used Revit much, but this
information does make Revit seem like a great tool that I should learn to use.
Source:
Eastman, C. M. (2011). BIM Handbook : A Guide to Building
Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and
Contractors. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Comments:
-To Matt:
That point you brought up regarding the computational power
regarding the parametric modeling is on point.
I completely overlooked that aspect of the advancements of parametric
modeling. Although that type of modeling
does make it easier for properties and attributes to update, it’s still important
for engineers to be careful when designing so that if a future edit is made,
the program doesn’t crash due to insufficient power.
-To Steve:
You’re very lucky to work with EwingCole and have that experience
using Revit for projects. I know some
companies I interviewed with were hesitant about switching over to 3D modeling
but from the sounds of it, it would be a worthwhile endeavor for companies to
do.
-To Esther:
I like how you touched upon the specific strengths and
weaknesses between Revit and Tekla. I
was going to do something like that in my post, but you beat me to the
punch. I never used Tekla as a program
before either, but it does sound quite useful for structural design.
I've never heard of Tekla before: I'm going to guess that BIM was intended to originally help for coordination of the interior systems, which are pretty independent on the structure. Then again, I just read about how BIM helps contractors (chp. 6), so coordination of subcontractors is on my mind.
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting that you pointed out that each program fits a purpose. Chapter 6 mentioned the constant need for additional software to do things such as estimating. Luckily, since AutoCAD has many of the additional program needed, using Revit would accept those plugins. Not sure how any of the other programs interface with additional software that may be needed.